Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs

Peter Stothard - Times Online - WBLG

« Anti-apartheid first? | All Posts | Black barricades »

February 23, 2006

Harvard and the money men

Harvard University does not have too much to celebrate right now - unless you are one of the faculty members who have been fighting to oust President Larry Summers and have finally this week succeeded.

This putsch by liberal arts professors against a modernising business-like boss has parallels in higher education around the world - not least in Britain where many Oxford and Cambridge dons would like to be free from what they see as alien money-men masters.

Harvard folk can proudly, however, raise a glass today to one the greatest contributions to scholarship from their past - a reminder of a time when arts and money enjoyed a happier marriage.

This is publication time for the 500th volume in the Loeb Classical Library, pride of the Harvard University Press.

My first thought on hearing this was "only 500?".

It has always seemed more.

From the red and green spatterings around my book-shelves, I thought I had at least a 1000 of them myself, with their uniform gold lettering, their ancient Greek and Latin texts and English translations on facing pages.

But no. That, it seems, is the number.

And the honour of being the 500th falls to Quintilian (Lesser Declamations, 1), a milestone in this  series which, as Virginia Woolf wrote in the TLS in 1917, has so long been "a gift of freedom" to those whose love of the classics is greater than their linguistic facility.

It is a temptation to think of James Loeb, the founder of the Library, in a Greco-Roman heaven somewhere, flicking through the latest volumes.

Those were the days when Wall Streeters and humanities professors understood each other rather better than they do now.

Loeb was far from the only New York banker to dream of perpetuating his name through educational philanthropy. But he was one of the most welcomed, the most inventive and successful.

If he were back for the 500 party, would easily recognise his latest books as siblings of the old.

The new works of Quintilian, being in Latin, are red, slightly brighter than my old copies - but that may just be the burnish of youth.

Green is still reserved for Greek. The size remains compact.

And Quintilian is a writer of whom the founder might have particularly approved.

Loeb, the German-Jewish dreamer who followed his father into high finance, could have found many parallels between himself and Quintilian, the Spanish orator, who followed his own father in to the newly profitable business of teaching people to speak.

Both men were wealthy classicists. Both were exiles. Both were protesters against the barbarian prejudices of their age and each proposed copious study as the remedy.

Every early edition of the Loeb Classical Library carried the sponsor's message, "A word about its purpose and its scope", which attacked the turn-of-the-century rush for mechanical and social achievement and what was then the neglect of the humanities.

The banker's son admired the way in which any Parisian could buy cheap copies of Latin and Greek texts, with a simple parallel translation into their language. He wanted English readers to have the same.

Loeb was primarily the paymaster - which is always what academics want money-men to be.

Quintilian was one of many ancient authors who were never going to make any money for a publisher. So he badly needed a business sponsor.

A few American educationalists in the inter-war years might study his sections on the primary syllabus of the first century AD.

A few literary critics needed the section in which he gives the contemporary verdict on classic writers.

But the publication of the full 12 books of the Institutio Oratoria, now in five volumes, was always going to be a labour of love.

Loeb's money made sure that Quintilian got into print and, despite the vicissitudes of war and bookselling, stayed in print.

His contribution was more, however, than just money. Although his mental health was poor, his political loyalties painfully stretched during the great war and his business stamina permanently under strain, he organised his scholars, designers and editors with keen attention.

Loeb objected to the materialist education of his age, felt the familiar guilt of liberal capitalists at that time and since, and wondered what to do about it.

Quintilian's own objection to the educational rules of Rome was less to do with the excess of materialism than the lack of morality. After making his fortune by schooling the children of the rich to pursue each other in court, he decided to write a lengthy protest against those who dressed up their verse and prose to conceal bad intentions.

Spin-meisters, as we might call them.

Quintilian lived in an age of sudden concentration of power, wealth and terror. He knew that his oratorical arts, officially recognised as Roman for the first time by the emperors, could kill.

He wanted to promote the better and prohibit the worse.

Loeb idealised almost the whole of classical civilisation. It was his means of escape.

Quintilian idealised specifically the century before his own, the age of Cicero when the good man and the good orator could be seen as synonymous. It was his means of self-defence.

The beginning of the Institutio Oratoria is an account of how teachers can ensure that pupils absorb virtue as well as verbal facility. Quintilian later examines how the great classical writers, from Homer to Propertius, could be mined by seekers after truth, goodness and a good line of argument.

Homer stands high. Propertius, the salon love poet, is subject, by contrast, to one of the neater put-downs in Latin criticism, "sunt qui malint Propertium" -"some prefer Propertius", as Donald Russell's new translation crisply puts it.

Loeb sought refuge in the classics from a life of severe depression that was scarred at an early age by American anti-semitism and in the years before his death by the rise of Hitler in his German home.

He died in 1933 before it could be shown how false was the hope that the greatest culture could prevent the greatest evils.

Quintilian had the advantage of living close in time to some of the greatest writers that have ever lived and the disadvantage of living under tyrants almost as bad as Hitler.

The shared lasting virtue of both Loeb and Quintilian was to make it possible for others to read and understand better.

It is fitting this year that the older man should be deployed to salute the younger - and to give the malcontents of the Massachusetts campuses something genuinely worth celebrating.

Posted by Peter Stothard on February 23, 2006 at 10:52 in Books | Permalink

Comments

Loathe as I am to disagree with Sir Peter I must do so here. I agree with Mr Bob Barrington: let us launch a movement to fight for the Classics to be compulsorily taught in schools.
We owe it to our children and their children and their children's children to try. Had I been forced to study Latin and Greek as a boy who knows what I would have become?

Posted by: patrick collingwood | 3 Mar 2006 12:05:34

I agree with you , Sir Peter, call me new-fashioned too.

I've got an eighteen-year-old son who reads classics by himself. One day he said 'I am tired of my own ignorance. ' And he began to read Homer!

In our library there is only one Loeb book, Seneca's Tragedies. So, we must buy only 499. A good reason to live, isn't it? Ricardo Moraes

Posted by: ricardo moraes | 2 Mar 2006 18:44:30

. . . call me new-fashioned, mr barrington, but i don't believe in compulsory classics for all. . the best news in recent years has been the growth of languages-from-scratch courses offered at universities for those who want to study classics in the traditional way but missed the kind of school that might have given them the tools. . .

Posted by: peter stothard | 1 Mar 2006 14:51:16

Thank you for this background on my favorite library. I'm passing it along.

Posted by: Dion Per Sona | 25 Feb 2006 08:27:45

It is my contention the reason Sir Peter has had an unparalled career is his upbringing as a boy in the Classics. It honed his mind into and equipped him with knowledge and historical perspective. Would Sir Peter agree with me that the Classics should be compulsory in ALL schools and not confined to the elite institutions favoured by the wealthy? Better the Classics than 'vocational' subjects such as woodwork, cookery, media studies, car mechanics, computing, fashion design, sports science, plumbing and the like!

Posted by: bob barrington | 24 Feb 2006 17:03:41

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

  • Weekly book reviews and literary criticism from the Times Literary Supplement

    Subscribe to the TLS for less

    Your writer

    Sir Peter Stothard,
    is Editor of the Times Literary Supplement, the international journal of books and ideas. Between 1992 and 2002 he was Editor of The Times and in 2003 he wrote, Thirty Days, a fly-on-the-wall account of Tony Blair in Downing Street during the Iraq War. He writes on politics and literature, ancient and modern.


    Send Peter an email


    Subscribe to RSS feed

    Latest posts

    Latest comments

    Categories

    Select from the dropdown

    TLS Links

    • ARLT
    • Art News Blog
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • The After-Dinner Payback
    • Blogographos
    • Culture Wars
    • EuroTopics
    • Frank Wilson
    • GoldenRuleJones
    • Houyhnhnm Land
    • Kenneth Anderson
    • ReadySteadyBook
    • Real Clear Politics
    • Rogue Classicism
    • SciTech Daily
    • Stephen Mitchelmore
    • The Elegant Variation
    • The Literary Saloon
    • The Little Professor
    • Unspeak
    • Barone blog
    • Brit Lit Blogs
    • Roman history books

    Archives

    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008

    Times Online
    Books

    • Books
    • Book Reviews
    • Book Extracts
    • Books Group
    Other Times Online blogs
    • Alpha Mummy
    • BabyBarista
    • Ariel Leve
    • Big Brother
    • Charles Bremner
    • Comment Central
    • Line and length
    • Formula One
    • India Knight
    • Inside Iraq
    • Mary Beard (TLS)
    • Mick Smith
    • Money Central
    • News
    • Rugby League
    • Sports Commentary
    • Richard Lloyd Parry
    • Ruth Gledhill
    • Tech Central
    • Crime Central
    • Urban Dirt
    • The Game